The United States (US) is yet to completely come out of the financial crisis that began in 2007-2008. Parts of the European Union (EU) are still going through a financial crisis. East Asia faced a major crisis in 1997-1998. What about India? There was a crisis in early 1990s but that was a long time ago and it was rather mild compared with crises elsewhere. The recent slowdown in growth, and turmoil in the currency market in India in September this year are disturbing but they are very far from being labelled a financial crisis. India has somewhat consistently performed much better with regard to macro-financial stability relative to the rest of the world. However, this stability has come at a high cost. In this column, I present a diagnosis of the problems confronting policymakers, discuss the solutions being used at present, and suggest alternative policies .
We conclude that there is systemic risk in India. But then why is there no financial crisis?
The government has imposed regulations such as the Statutory Liquidity Ratio (SLR) requirement. Banks are required to invest at least 23% of their funds in what are basically government bonds. This regulation creates a captive market for government bonds. This implies that the government hardly faces any problem in financing its deficits. So a fiscal crisis gets averted! However, there are no free lunches. There is an adverse effect on the borrowers and depositors of banks - bank credit falls; interest rate rises for borrowers and falls for depositors. Bank credit for industry and trade falls further as banks are required to (a) lend 40% of their net bank credit to the priority sectors, and (b) observe 4% Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR)4. There is also lack of effective competition among (public sector) banks. So there is a shift of funds from deposits to other assets like real estate and gold and even to stocks, which have their own problems.
Figure 1 below shows the relative decline of the banking sector vis-à-vis the stock market. One reason for this is financial repression (excessive controls/ regulations imposed on banks, often with a view to ease the government’s fiscal constraint).
Figure 1. Comparison of stock market capitalisation and bank deposits (in crore Rupees5)
Source: Singh 2013
Next, consider home prices. Why do house prices not crash if they are high? The reason is simple. There is some kind of a ‘license-permit-quota Raj’ in the real estate sector in India that keeps supply low and prices high. The popular view is that prices are high and rising due to rising demand. However, rising demand need not lead to a significant rise in real prices in the long run if supply is allowed to keep pace (as has been the experience, by and large, in the US and elsewhere).
Until recently, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had been holding large foreign exchange reserves relative to Gross Domestic Product (GDP). While this can avoid a currency crisis, there is a large and persistent opportunity cost as these funds could have earned higher returns elsewhere.
Another mitigating factor is the jumps in inflation rate. There have been un-anticipated jumps in inflation rate in India in 1963-1964, 1973-1974, 1979-1980, around 1990, 1997-1998, and around 2009. This factor reduces the debt of the government and firms in real terms. So a debt crisis is averted! However, there is a social cost. People shift to assets such as gold and real estate that are hedged against inflation. Investment in such assets instead of say, machinery can lead to lower growth outcomes. Due to low real returns on debt instruments (such as bank deposits, bonds etc.) people may also shift to the stock market. Though the expected returns can be high, there is a risk, which is not always manageable by ‘ordinary’ households.
The government goes in for somewhat regular bailouts in different forms such as assistance for airline companies, loan waivers for farmers, protecting existing banks by putting barriers to entry for new ones etc.. Such bailouts can mitigate a financial crisis but they have high costs associated with them.
Yet another mitigating factor is the confidence among people that the government will almost certainly step in, should anything untoward happen in the banking system. The government adds to the capital of public sector banks (PSBs) despite being fiscally constrained: it sells bonds to banks, raises funds, and uses these funds to increase the capital of PSBs. See below a stylised balance sheet of a PSB - it has government bonds as assets and capital from the government as a liability. There is no net inflow of funds when PSBs are re-capitalised.
If the fiscal situation does not improve, then the confidence in banks is somewhat misplaced. Such confidence can help maintain macro-financial stability but it is not a reliable hedge against systemic risk.
Figure 2. Stylised balance sheet of a Public Sector Bank (PSB)
The last mitigating factor is growth. Though there has been a slowdown in recent years, the growth rate in India in the last two decades has been high by international standards, and by India’s own historical record. Growth acts as a camouflage for several problems. However, the problems do not go away, they are just less visible.
To summarise, current policies do mitigate a financial crisis (Mohan 2011). However, there are problems with these policies.
While there are no quick fixes, long-term changes can be brought in gradually.
There is a need for fiscal correction in the form of reduction in tax exemptions and tax evasion, and keeping a check on expenditures. Along with cuts on wasteful expenditure, it is also important to bring about an increase in other important expenditures such as infrastructure and direct assistance for priority sector. This can pave the way for a reduction in mandatory bank lending to the priority sector.
With fiscal correction, the government can gradually reduce the SLR and CRR, and hence financial repression in banks. The banking sector can then grow faster and play a greater role in economic development.
In Public Economics, a Pigouvian tax-subsidy scheme6 is often used to deal with externalities such as pollution. Similarly, a tax-subsidy scheme may be used to deal with macroeconomic shocks (Jeanne and Korinek 2010, Singh 2013). For example, sudden and large international capital flows may be discouraged by a temporary tax on such flows. If macroeconomic shocks can be dealt with in this way by fiscal policy, then the burden on the monetary policy can be reduced. So the central bank can focus on managing inflation instead of pursuing multiple macroeconomic objectives at the same time.
The real estate sector was left out of the liberalisation process that took place in the early 1990s. There is a need to remove the ‘license-permit-quota Raj’ that currently prevails in this sector7. The recent bills related to real estate passed in Parliament do not address these concerns.
After the large fall in the value of the rupee in September this year, the RBI is considering an increase in its reserves. This is not required. As suggested in my previous column on this portal, the RBI can instead buy international credit lines that work out cheaper than foreign exchange reserves8.
As suggested earlier on this portal9 the RBI can also provide inflation-indexed bonds more meaningfully than is the case at present10 . This can reduce demand for gold and help in other ways. The RBI can also set an example by not buying more gold, if not by selling its existing gold stock. This will give it greater moral authority to advise the public not to buy gold.
- The interested reader can see detailed arguments and some data in a related paper (Singh 2013).
- This is particularly true if we use new measures from Reinhart and Rogoff 2009.
- The credit rating of a bond assesses the credit worthiness or the ability to meet financial obligations/ commitments of the entity issuing the bond.
- Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) is a specified minimum fraction of the total deposits of customers, which commercial banks have to hold as reserves either in cash or as deposits with the central bank.
- 1 crore = 10 million
- A Pigouvian tax is a tax applied to a market activity that is generating negative externalities (costs for somebody else). In the presence of negative externalities, the social cost of a market activity is not covered by the private cost of the activity. In such a case, the market outcome is not efficient and may lead to over-consumption of the product. In the presence of positive externalities (public benefits from a market activity), those who receive the benefit do not pay for it and the market may under-supply the product. Similar logic suggests the creation of a Pigouvian subsidy to make the users pay for the extra benefit and spur more production.
- See Shiller (2009) for related issues.
- An international credit line is an option to borrow from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) or other central banks at reasonable interest rate. This is useful at a time when usual credit markets tend to dry up. See http://ideasforindia.in/article.aspx?article_id=125
- Banks need to observe 23% SLR. So their demand for eligible bonds like inflation-indexed bonds (IIBs) is large, and they out-compete the public in the market for IIBs. Hence, the purpose of IIBs is defeated, and the demand for gold (hedged against inflation) continues to be high.
- Jeanne, Olivier, and Anton Korinek (2010), “Excessive volatility in capital flows: A Pigouvian taxation approach”, American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 100(2), 403-407.
- Mohan, R (2011), Growth with Financial Stability – Central Banking in an Emerging Market, Oxford University Press.
- Reinhart, Carmen M., and Kenneth S. Rogoff (2009), This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly, Princeton University Press.
- Shiller, Robert J. (2009), “Unlearned lessons from the housing bubble”, The Economists´ Voice, 6 (7)
- Singh, Gurbachan (2013), “Is India hedged against systemic risk? An attempt at an answer”, Review of market Integration, 5(1), 83-129.